[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Limited mandate for interim panel
- To: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Limited mandate for interim panel
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 21:11:15 -0700
- CC: atlarge discuss list <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPEEIJCFAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
Joanna and all stakeholders of interested parties,
Joanna Lane wrote:
> > Any one on the team should be qualified to occupy an ICANN Board seat if
> > and when that time comes.
>
> > --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
>
> A child of 3 would be better qualified to occupy a Board seat than most of
> the current incumbents - at least they *share* their toys - but that's not
> the point. ICANN has dropped the ball on the At Large Elections.
Yes unfortunately we are saddled with ICANN BoD members that
are of a less than reasonable quality and especially not of the stakeholders
choice with the exception of Karl and Andy...
> If Jamie's
> GA initiative to rebid the ICANN contract fails for whatever reason, and we
> do not pick up the ball to run the At Large elections for them, then
> appointees of the Nominating Committee will be imposed upon us to represent
> the At Large interest. I don't think that's what we want, is it?
No it is not what our [INEGroup] members would like to see, that's for sure...
However the ICANNATLARGE.COM effort thus far is not seemingly going
very well either...
>
>
> Why not run elections for At Large Board seats as well in July?
I see no reason why ICANNATLARGE.COM and other At-Large
efforts underway could not do this... The ICANN present ICANN BOD
of course will likely reject them though...
>
>
> See Icannatlarge.com Forum, Best Practices, Grass Roots Nine Seat Challenge.
> http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=90&highlight=.
>
> Regards,
> Joanna
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de