[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ALSC-Forum] icannatlarge.com security issue
- To: DannyYounger@cs.com
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ALSC-Forum] icannatlarge.com security issue
- From: Joop Teernstra <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:44:48 +1200
- Cc: email@example.com, Bruce@barelyadequate.info, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-To: mailing list email@example.com
- In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-Post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mailing-List: contact email@example.com; run by ezmlm
At 10:25 p.m. 10/05/2002 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>I have never advocated "no icannatlarge.com"... instead I have chastised the
>membership for failing to produce a proposal to incorporate the At-Large into
>the ICANN structure, and for being diverted into building yet another
>At-Large structure while there are already plenty of At-Large structures out
Please tell us, which ones are out there? How are they structured? Funded?
Are they specifically made up of people who know what ICANN is about?
[or should I read your advocacy of ISOC as the answer?]
>This has shifted the energy away from attacking ICANN's perverse
>plans, and has resulted in an unorganized opposition that is more focused on
>procedural matters (voting, bylaws, etc.) than on substantive plans to
>protect the At-large and to guarantee the seating of At-Large directors.
I see it exactly from the opposite direction.
Wasting our time making proposals to an ICANN that is stone deaf to
individual opinions distracts from the essential structure building that
will allow our representatives (to whomever plays the ICANN role) to speak
with the autority of a large membership.
>Call it anarchy if you like, but I prefer it to your organized lethargy.
To each his own, Danny. Organized lethargy (=foundation building) will
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
Sign up and spread the word.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
For additional commands, e-mail: email@example.com