Re: [atlarge-discuss] online voting

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Jamie and all stakeholders or interested parties,

  Yes the DNSO GA voting method is ok depending on whom are
the "Watchdogs".  As you may recall the DNSO GA has had some
serious problems there on occasion.

  The "Voting Booth" by Joop T., has also met with very questionable
verification of registered voters or voters that are not really registered
as well as escrow of the voting database.

  I would recommend Surevote at: http://www.surevote.com/  which is very
similar to our [INEGroups] Voting mechanism..

James Love wrote:

> What is the current state of play with online voting?  The DNSO type voting
> seems to have some good features regarding verifying how one's vote was
> calculated.  Do we want public or secret voting?  Does it cost money to have
> these fancy voting services, or are they inexpensive or free software tools
> that volenteers can use?   Are there good articles on pros and cons for
> this?
>
> Jamie
>
> --------------------------------
> James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de