[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] online voting
- To: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>, "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] online voting
- From: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 21:16:39 -0400
- Cc: "atlarge discuss list" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>, "Alexander Svensson" <alexander@svensson.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPGEAHCGAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> I don't disagree with you, but question the usefulness of the data if
there
> are no known political boundaries to interpret results. It's fine to
report
> that "X" voted for democrats v. "X" voted for republicans v. "x" voted for
> independent in region "X". That's useful to all parties, but given that
> there are no political parties, what criteria do you want reported
exactly?
Ok, suppose the @large had a vote on whether or not to go with a one
person one vote rule, or something that was based upon regional
representation, and US voters wanted a one person one vote rule, but
everyone from Asia was opposed to it. (Or the other way around). I think
that would be important to know.
Jamie
--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de