[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] New name for Icannatlarge.com



> How about just @large?
>
> Jamie

Works for me.
AtLarge.org belongs to Marc Schneiders.
I just picked up Atlarge.us and redirected it to Icannatlarge.com with a
catchall email address to me.

Cheers,
Joanna





WHOIS information for atlarge.org:

Registrar:  TUCOWS, INC.

Organization:  Venster
address:  Laan van Vollenhove 1733
   Zeist, 3706   GH     NL

Admin contact:  Schneiders, Marc
email:  marc@schneiders.org
phone:  31 30 6992825
fax:

Tech contact:  Schneiders, Marc
email:  domadmin@venster.nl
phone:  +31 30 6992825
fax:

Nameservers:  remember.ifwp.org
fuchsia.bijt.net


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>
> To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 9:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] New name for Icannatlarge.com
>
>
> > Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > >I personally like neither ICANN nor At Large as part of our name. (This
> is
> > one of the few things I disagree with Bruce Young >about!)
> >
> > You're allowed! :)
> >
> > My reason *for* the "At Large" moniker is driven by the same source, but
> in
> > a different environment (the US vs. the UK):  The  tech press here
> > recognizes it (to the little extent it does!), and losing it
> would lose us
> > what little recognition we have today.  That's very little, I grant you,
> but
> > little is better than none!
> >
> > >I take the view that in order not to be subsumed and marginalised by
> ICANN
> > we need the authority of scale, and we need to >broaden our mission and
> our
> > membership by popularising our message and going for large
> scale outreach
> in
> > all regions.
> >
> > Agreed.  This has to be a "world party" or it doesn't work.
> >
> > >I take the view that to occupy a narrow and obscure corner of
> the debate,
> > and to embrace a limited mission with a limited >name, will (a) attract
> > limited numbers (b) be easier for ICANN to fend off or marginalise.
> >
> > I don't disagree here.  That's why I called for replacing "ICANN" in our
> > name with "Internet Users."
> >
> > >I therefore favour more generic names along these lines (not
> saying they
> > are specifically the right ones, but to give some >idea of the
> direction I
> > think we should take in the organisation's name):
> > Democratic Control; Democratic Assembly; Democratic Internet; Internet
> > Democracy Movement; or The Internet Parliament (which I've
> registered); or
> > PeopleWorldWide (which Bill Lovell has registered)
> >
> > Of these, I like Internet Democracy Movement the best.  In fact
> I like it
> > better than Internet Users At Large!  It succintly describes our intent
> > *and* our methods!
> >
> > >I take the view that the mandate of the Interim Panel expires after 12
> > weeks and that if possible we should press forward
> > >more urgently.
> >
> > I agree.  We need to hit the ground running!
> >
> >
> > Bruce Young
> > Portland, Oregon
> > Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> > http://www.barelyadequate.info
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Support democratic control of the Internet!
> > Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de