[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Members' rights
- To: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Members' rights
- From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 21:57:21 +1200
- Cc: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <052201c2009a$897d2980$2b9d5c8b@essential.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020521170634.0216d978@pop.paradise.net.nz>
At 03:38 a.m. 21/05/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
>: 2. Members must not work against their organization.
>: 2.a. Expulsion rules
>
> What is this about? What does it mean, "members must not work against
>their organization"?
This is a proposed attempt to protect the organization against "members'
who actively engage in undermining the organization, e.g. by questioning
its *agreed* purpose, by bad-mouthing *the organization* in other fora, by
discouraging all and sundry to stand for office, etc.
I think there is logic in asking that members support the organization they
want to belong to , either financially or in deeds.
An organization as open as what is proposed here needs some kind of
protection against individuals who want to destroy it.
--Joop
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de