[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Thomas Roessler proposes elimination of current voting system for GA
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Thomas Roessler proposes elimination of current voting system for GA
- From: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:05:10 -0400
- Cc: "atlarge discuss list" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <0ba401c207e5$e54eb100$0a00a8c0@essential.org> <20020530172743.GG27077@yoda.does-not-exist.org>
Your post was interesting for at least two reasons. It proposed that
non-secret ballots on substance were superior to secret ballots, an issue
discussed here earlier. It is also indicated a particular view of having
"uninformed" persons voting on ICANN policy questions. These are relevant,
IMO, to what the at large may address in its mission or proceedures.
jl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
Cc: "atlarge discuss list" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:27 PM
Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Thomas Roessler proposes elimination of
current voting system for GA
: On 2002-05-30 10:25:47 -0400, James Love wrote:
:
: >For the GA, Thomas Roessler wants to get rid of secrete vote on
: >policy issues, and the elimination of the current voting system
: >for resolutions.
:
: How's the fact that I have made that proposal relevant to this list?
: I'd suppose that you folks should really have more important things
: to discuss than what I say on the GA list.
:
: Anyway, let me just note that the main argument I make DOES NOT
: APPLY to an at-large membership organization like the one you are
: trying to build at icannatlarge.com. After all, the very
: construction principle of an at-large membership is to form a group
: of individuals - with no further structure.
:
: (Apart of that, it's none of my business what kind of process you
: folks use for statements on ICANN policy.)
:
: --
: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
:
: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
: To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
: For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de