Re: [atlarge-discuss] Bucharest meeting

[Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>]

I think that is of course possible. Even comments can be accepted
if all members or the chair agree.

I intend to be functional and effective, but not secretive  at all.

izumi


At 08:28 02/06/06 -0700, eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>May I suggest that your closed meetings be closed to comment but not observance.
>
>Eric
>
>Izumi AIZU wrote:
>
> > Thank you Vittorio for your efforts.
> >
> > I will arrive at late Sunday, so Monday/Tuesday should be no problem
> > for me.
> >
> > I would suggest to have:
> >
> > Monday/Tuesday - informal meetings, open and perhaps closed,
> > to prepare for Open meeting on Wednesday.
> >
> > In my experience with NAIS, one-day meeting with open members
> > will not be sufficient to discuss and understand all the issues and
> > reach meaningful agreement.
> >
> > That is just my suggestion. Let's be flexible and mindful for
> > those who cannot attend in person, too.
> >
> > izumi



                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
                  Asia Network Research
                         www.anr.org
                              &
  GLOCOM /Institute for HyperNetwork Society

         << Writing the Future of the History >> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de