Re: [atlarge-discuss] news from bucharest: at large existsagain

[James Love <james.love@cptech.org>]

Izumi was quite clear he spoke for himself.  VB was not.  VB spoke as chair 
of icannatlarge.com.

Jamie


Izumi AIZU wrote:
> Dear Todd,
> 
> This approach is often used, to show where you belong to, but also 
> indicates that
> the comment or opinion does not represent that body officially.
> 
> That was my intention. If it gave any misunderstanding to you, sorry
> about that.
> 
> izumi
> 
> At 06:47 02/06/27 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> 
> 
>> > ---------------
>> > As one of 7 elected members of interim panel of icannatlarge.com, but
>> > speaking only for
>> > myself now, I like to point out the strong need for the recognition and
>> > implementation
>> > of At-Large participatory structure by the Board which will lead the
>> > appropriate allocation
>> > of decision-making position at the Board level to At-Large.
>>
>> Aizu-san  - SO this says "Since I am one of the officials, but here I am
>> only speaking for myself..."  - Either you are speaking as one of the 
>> seven
>> or as a private citizen, so which is it and why mention the other 
>> status if
>> you are not speaking from it as well?
>>
>> >
>> > In some countries and cultures, without invitation or recognition, 
>> people
>> > will anyway
>> > speak up and demand their interests be included in decision-making. In
>> > other parts of the
>> > world however, it is more difficult to expect that to happen. They 
>> tend to
>> > wait. So if you
>> > do not consciously "reach-out" to the users, individual and others, and
>> > provide adequate
>> > incentives for participation and representation, ICANN will definitely
>> > become like an
>> > ordinary trade association dominated by providers. I think that is not
>> > healthy and will
>> > give harm to the providers themselves.
>> >
>> > Finally, as we are working hard to self-organize the at-large members
>> > globally, I again
>> > like to call for the formal adoption of At-Large participation 
>> mechanism
>> > and therefore
>> > welcomes the idea of At-Large Advisory Committee as the first one small
>> > step for us
>> > here now, but hope it to become the one giant leap for ICANN and all 
>> the
>> > players in
>> > the long run globally.
>>
>> So what was the result of this commntary by you?
> 
> 
> People listened to it, no question came in. There are some 25 to 30
> people making comments in line.
> 
> izumi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 
> 
> 



-- 
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de