Re: [atlarge-discuss] Vint Cerf Introduce Motion to ApproveBlueprint

[eric@hi-tek.com]

No!

We must work within and without ICANN.
ICANN has crossed a threshold of hatred and denial of user representativeness.

We can work with a swine, but we must not relegate ourselves to live with it.
These people are wrong and cannot be negotiated with except from a position of
some power.
Let us build our power base in popular opinion and organization.

Eric

Esther Dyson wrote:

>   Given that there will likely be no changes in the Blueprint  in any
> aspect (they don't want to open this can of worms), at least they seem to
> have found a way to fit an At-Large in under it through a resolution.  Our
> goal now is to get a specific set of criteria that an ALAC would have to
> meet, and then to meet those criteria - assuming that the creation of an
> At-Large Advisory Committee goes through. It is now on the table awaiting
> discussion (along with the other items below).
>
> Esther Dyson
>
> At 02:16 AM 6/28/2002, Alexander Svensson wrote:
> >At 27.06.2002 22:55, Lawrence Solum wrote:
> > >At approximately 11:00 a.m. Bucharest time, Vint Cerf has introduced a
> > >resolution to approve the blueprint without any modifications.
> >
> >The wording is "adopt and endorse".
> >The structure of the resolution, if I noted it correctly, is
> >about like this:
> >
> >Whereas [Stuart Lynn's President's Report]
> >Whereas [Board action, ERC process]
> >Whereas [ERC outreach, consultation and analysis]
> >Whereas [ERC input mechanisms, papers]
> >Whereas [Blueprint publishing]
> >Whereas [Blueprint contents]
> >Whereas [Public participation]
> >Whereas [Time for implementation]
> >
> >Therefore it is resolved
> >-- [adopted and endorses Blueprint and broad]
> >-- [that ERC oversees implementation and transition
> >     with continued involvement of community;
> >     schedule and implementation recommendation at
> >     next teleconference meeting]
> >-- [President to provide assistance and resources]
> >-- [Board takes note of importance of following
> >     issues and instructs ERC to take due account
> >     of them in the implementation:
> >     -- need to emphasize geographic and cultural
> >        diversity
> >     -- consider the creation of an ALAC
> >     -- ensure that composition and operation of NomCom
> >        in fact represents a balance
> >     -- collaborate with critical infrastructure
> >        providers and technical community to further
> >        establishment of effective working relationships
> >     -- ensure that policy development processes enhance
> >        and promote bottom-up policy development process]
> >-- [strengthen opportunities of ICANN's capacity to
> >     fulfill mission]
> >-- [takes note of ongoing community involvement]
> >
> >However, the discussion is currently going on.
> >Best regards,
> >/// Alexander
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> >For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
> Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
> chairman, EDventure Holdings
> writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
> edyson@edventure.com
> 1 (212) 924-8800    --   fax  1 (212) 924-0240
> 104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
> New York, NY 10011 USA
> http://www.edventure.com
>
> The conversation continues..... at
> http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de