[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] What are we?
- To: "eric@hi-tek.com" <eric@hi-tek.com>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] What are we?
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:32:51 -0700
- CC: Vittorio Bertola <vb@vitaminic.net>, "atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>, Esther Dyson <edyson@edventure.com>, "Joe (Virus Laden web page expert) Sims" <jsims@jonesday.com>, denise michel <denisemichel@sbcglobal.net>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <3D25EEC6.D6914ED@hi-tek.com>
Eric and all stakeholders and other interested parties,
I guess to answer the question you pose in the Subject line:
"Who are we" depends on whom "we" is. So whom is the
"We" in your question Eric? For the moment I will rightly or
wrongly assume by the "We" in you subject line question you
are referring to the ICANNATLARGE.COM members
and/or future members. If I am right in that assumption, than
your follow on questions and comments below have or
seem to have some interesting relevance to any At-Large
membership, and especially ICANNATLARGE.COM's
as many of ICANNATLARGE.COM's members would
seem to be unexceptable to the ICANN BOD and staff
and therefor would likely disqualify same a an "Approved"
organization in whatever the ICANN BoD and staff
have in mind, or should I say Esther, Denise, and Joe
Sims have in mind???
I would also say given Vittorio's recent postings and activities
in Bucharest, that Vittorio is playing both sides of the fence, much
a Joop had done with the IDNO... That would no doubt limit
outreach significantly...
eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
> I am sorry but I just do not understand number 3 of Vittorio's
> suggestion.
> Does it limit our participation to only ICANN matters?
> If so, that makes us subject to their whims it would seem.
> Also it will seriously hamper outreach if we are tied so closely.
> Where did the notion come from that we should be "approved" by ICANN?
>
> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de