Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name...

[eric@hi-tek.com]

This is why the wig concept seems so right
e

Judith Oppenheimer wrote:

> The multitude of names I find very confusing.  Were I an internet user
> contemplating joining this organization, I'd expect it to have *a* name.
>
> Not a different name for every day of the week and time zone.
>
> I don't mean to be flip, but from a branding POV it makes no sense.
>
> In addition, *you* think IETF; ICANN, NTIA, etc. for internet governance.
>
> (a) Do you think John Q. Online Public is familiar with these names?
>
> and (b) Which one of these entities represents internet governance by and
> for the people?
>
> J
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Judith Oppenheimer
> http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
> http://WhoSells800.com
> 212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:13 PM
> > To: Judith Oppenheimer; 'Joop Teernstra';
> > atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> > Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name...
> >
> >
> > Dear Judith,
> > please understand that there are two issues at stake.
> >
> > 1. the name - best name for our @lareg confederation for the
> > reasons I
> > documented is probably world@large. It is a compromise but it has a
> > mnemonic, historical , graphic, legitimacy, political convergence of
> > raeasons making it a good compromise.
> >
> > 2. the organization - we can only be a confedration of interest. That
> > confederation can only be built to the image of the Internet
> > governance.
> > Here we use xxx@large were governance uses IETF; ICANN, NTIA,
> > ccTLDs.  So
> >
> > icann@large is the name of the WG relating with ICANN
> > ietf@large is the group of our IETF Members
> > france@large is the name of our French association
> >
> > 3. the accesses to the sites. The only problem we have today
> > is that we
> > have not http://atlarge.org.
> > When we have it we can develop the @large namespace in
> > registering 3LDs such as
> > icann.atlarge.org
> > france.atlarge.org
> > which will provide an easy way to manage the confedration. The Panel
> > playing the same role as Jon Postel to keep the things organized. An
> > organization is made by its web site.
> >
> > What Joop says is that http://icannatlarge.com has a lot of links.
> > We will progressively add http://icannatlarge.org etc... as
> > the one you
> > registered as ALIASES
> >
> > What we want is the largest number of people to know us. All
> > of them will
> > land into http://worlatlarge.org until we can make ot
> > http://world.atlarge.org too.
> >
> > The largest number of names, the more links we have in search engines.
> > jfc
> >
> > At 03:58 14/08/02, Judith Oppenheimer wrote:
> >
> > >I disagree.  Vociferously.
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > >----------
> > >Judith Oppenheimer
> > >http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> > >http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
> > >http://WhoSells800.com
> > >212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> > >-------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > >----------
> > >Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
> > >-------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > >----------
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:39 PM
> > > > To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> > > > Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My first choice would be icannatlarge.org, currently held by
> > > > elected panel
> > > > member Jefsey Morfin.
> > > > Jefsey could provide a re-direct to our current web presence.
> > > >
> > > > We should think twice before abandoning the recognition (1650
> > > > google links)
> > > > that we have built up so far.
> > > >
> > > > Why keep the "icann" string?
> > > >
> > > > Because icann, like it or not, is our defining battle ground.
> > > >
> > > > --Joop
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > >Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 02/08/02
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de