On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 13:16, espresso@e-scape.net wrote: > > Personally, I'm rather against the use of graphics, frames and tables > except where they are really essential, and in favour of providing > alternate (accessible by text-browser or text-to-speech software for > the visually impaired) pages where they are used. I agree, but don't forget "Java, Flash, ActiveX, and anything else not listed on http://w3.org ". Internally storing XML and translating it to "your choice of output format" would be handy, though perhaps unnecessarily complex for the majority of the website. Anyone know of any Wikis that offer this? For some documents -- Charter, Bylaws, etc. -- this would be very handy. Imagine printing them out for marking up or reading on the bus. For this purpose, an on-the-fly translation from XML to PDF would be appropriate. $0.02USD, -s
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part