[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] WG-WEB: responses to Jamie
Richard and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,
Richard Henderson wrote:
> Jefsey,
>
> To tell you the truth, I am very unhappy with the decision to use
> icannatlarge.org
>
> I think it is contentious, unhelpful and a bad choice.
Agreed. But it is the will of the members that it shall be our new
DN.
As I recall just recently you were very happy with the vote and a
democratic
process making this decision.
>
>
> I would fully support you if you chose to withdraw it. I feel we need
> a name like atlarge.org which can then be used with 100's of
> appropriate subdomains, and the devolution of webmaster
> responsibilities to a multiplicity of participants
I agree strongly with this approach Richard. It is very similar to
the
one we at {INEGroup] use. But our new DN does not preclude
us form doing as you IMHO, so rightly suggest. See below alternatives:
>
>
> canada.atlarge.org
Canada.icannatlarge.org, Canad.icannatlarge.ca
or even icannatlarge.ca
>
> outreach.atlarge.org
outreach.icannatlarge.org or
>
> fiji.atlarge.org
or, icannatlarge.fi and fiji.icannatlarge.org
>
> lotsof other things.atlarge.org
or, things.icannatlarge.org and icannatlarge.info
>
>
> There IS an issue of democratic will, of course, but I believe that
> most voters actively voted NOT to have the Icann name - they wanted
> anything other than the ICANN name, but their vote was split, whereas
> the pro-icann vote was focussed on a single name
>
> Besides, the name is not resolving, which is no use. And you (the
> owner/registrant of the name) advised against its use anyway, so why
> not withdraw the name and vote "Do we want the name ICANN in our name
> - YES or NO?"
I say no, and voted for another name at the original vote on this
issue.
BTW, I have no problem getting icannatlarge.org to resolve.
>
>
> I believe the democratic will is in favour of jettisoning the name
> ICANN
Than lets have another vote and find out...
>
>
> Richard
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
> To: atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:13 PM
> Subject: [atlarge-panel] WG-WEB: responses to Jamie
>
>
> On 12:05 02/10/02, James Love said:
> Jefsey,
> > 1. I don't think we want a web page run by hundreds of people.
> On the contrary, I think we want the web page to be managed by a few
> people who can keep it current, and make sure it serves to enhance the
> transparency of the group.
>
> This is something to be decided by the panel upon proposition of the
> WG-WEB, and possibly to the membership to decide. Right now I am quite
> hesitant to give Sotiris full powers. I frankly see no real difference
> between Joop and Sotiris at the present stage. I will set-up my mind
> when :
>
> 1. I get the site IP address - the question risen by Sotiris means
> that he does not understand how it works (what I doubt) or he wants a
> control equivalent to Joop, I am not prepared to grant him.
>
> 2. I see a draft site to understand what he plans. There was plenty
> of time for him to present a draft site on worldatlarge.org. My
> approach would be to have him set up worldatlarge.org as the future
> icannatlarge.org site so we can use both addresses and evaluate the
> way he sets a site up and the time he can dedicate to it.
>
> From your remarks, I understand that you never shared in a
> cooperative site or an e-zine. What you want is the way it works, but
> hundreds of people can cooperate. This is the only way to make some
> real outreach: to imply people. We will no reinvent the wheel.
>
> We start with 190 authors wanted, one per contry. Plus probably 20
> others, one per main topic, plus back-up and alternative views. I do
> not know if you looked at who is listed on our member list? Many are
> far more competent than me.
>
> > 2. We will have to make some policies on control of the site,
> and who has posting privledges. My own prefence is to have non-panel
> members maintain the content, so there are fewer transition issues in
> elections.
>
> Right. There should be tow or three people. IMHO a guy like
> NameCritic is a very good co-manager for such a task. There is areal
> difference between a one person's site (blog) and an e-zine. The first
> thing is to see how NameCritic and Satiris and Vittorio can make it
> together. Producing together is far more a challenge than
> talking/debating together.
>
> > 3. What is the deal over icannatlarge.org? Who controls this,
> and what will we have to do to get control of it?
>
> Ok. Let forget about that: I explained it 100 times. It seems that
> no one will ever want to read what I explain. So let me try to care
> about it. Just remember that none of you wanted to hear what I said
> and most went though that vote because our two Lady J hoped
> internetatlarge.org would win. This is over. Let me try to sort the
> mess. This is a task for the WG-DNS: it will be reported when sorted.
>
> The priority is to have WG-WEB to address the draft site issue, get
> public comments, organize a webmastering system which will not be
> worse than Joop's (anyone taking over as a webmaster will be
> confronted to the dilemn: either to be a tyrant to keep some order and
> personal time control or a dedicated professional with some real
> personal/financial motivations).
>
> jfc
>
>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-panel-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-panel-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de