RE: [atlarge-discuss] "IPv6 & ICANN is..."

["jkhan" <jkhan@metromgr.com>]

No Sir. I was using the 'message' of the quote:"... they correspond
strictly to the nature of the capitalist system in full expansion, which
transfers to the dependent countries the most abusive and barefaced
forms of exploitation. ..."

Indeed "in full expansion" on a global-scale via the internet. Not
"quoting a totalitarian killer like it was a good thing." but addressing
an issue as if it is a totalitarian killer.

James Khan


-----Original Message-----
From: h.steiner@scharr.de [mailto:h.steiner@scharr.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:55 AM
To: jkhan
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] "IPv6 & ICANN is..."


On 26 Nov 2002, at 8:51, jkhan wrote:

> Do you understand the issue?

Yes.
You were quoting a totalitarian killer like it was a good thing. I don't
think there was a misunderstanding.


> Do you understand that IPv6 by the installation itself creates "Dual
> Stacks" a physical segregation? Do you understand that within the 
> electronic engineering design itself the IPv6 protocol creates a 
> segregated system? Do you understand that with the IPv6 protocol, in 
> time the establishment of elite networks will be created separate but 
> equal to other elite networks over the Public infrastructure? Do you 
> understand that IPv6 will ride over the Public infrastructure IPv4 
> backbone at little to no transmission co$t? Do you understand that 
> Public access to information resting on IPv6 infrastructure has a 
> higher cost due to the IPv6: infrastructural cost, tunnel 
> (Intellectual Property within) operators, and additional cost 
> associated with the maintenance of IPv6? Do you understand that the 
> cost of "Knowledge" of the information available over the IPv6 system 
> will increase to due to 'proprietary royalties', and that availability

> decrease due to 'intellectual property' rights, and these cost will 
> increase in an ever increasing manner? Do you understand that a person

> from the 3rd World and Middle World will longer have access to 
> information over IPv6 networks due to the cost of entry?  Do you know 
> that when you create barriers, of electronic, economic, and social 
> design, you barr the access to knowledge? Do you understand, that when

> you shackled the doors to the Library of Knowledge (the Internet) with

> the cost, design, and secularism, you "Burn the books" within?

Do you understand the difference between burning books and giving 
them away for free?

I think you understand it, but your ramblings above show your just 
in it for its propaganda value.

 
> I believe you do understand, and as you say: "Let the assholes from
> the far left and the far right rot. They deserve it."

As I said, I do think I understand it.

 
> I believe the initial idea of the Internet was that of a Library, free
> access to knowledge for all. ALL

You DO know the history of ARPAnet?
Doesnt sound that way.

[snip]
> I believe what is at stake in this case, is the Holocaust of
> Knowledge:

You are using words like Holocaust for something like this?

Are you totally nuts?


As I said, go ahead and quote "Mein Kampf"...
 

mfg
H. Steiner


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de