Re: [atlarge-discuss] Killing ICANNAtLarge by division

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Alexander Svensson wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> the latest developments are truly sad for this organization.

What is truly sad is that this organization was already killed by its own
panel members...  that is, until they decide its time to resurrect it for
the purposes of the ICANN.  The gambit for this current panel is over.
Time for them to be replaced en masse.

>
> The domain icannatlarge.COM under control of Joop Teernstra
> now carries the following message:
>
> | Our original website is back on line.
> |
> | Our Forum is back on-line too, with the full content intact.
> | Icannatlarge.org is now on its own and the two sites
> | icannatlarge.org and icannatlarge.com will now start to diverge.
> |
> | We intend to do this in a democratic way in accordance with
> | the will of the majority of our members.
> |
> | For this we will utilize the facilities of the Polling Booth
> etc. etc.
>
> In other words, the original website has been hijacked by a
> "proactive webmaster" while the current panel members still
> haven't decided to stop the flood of meaningless INEGroup
> nonsense on the list.

The current Panel is a joke.  They have already killed the initiative of
this organization.

I believe it is high time for a coup.

BTW, where is panel member Satyajit Gupta these days... and why is he
still a panel member?

>
> I remember the outcries when the At Large Study Committee
> announced to close their list. I remember sniding remarks about
> Thomas Roessler's organization providing this list for free.
> Now, the list is unusable and the site is divided (with most
> links pointing to the hijacked site), and there are still
> people declaring that what remains of this organization is
> the only legitimate voice of users.

This "organization" has been effectively undermined by ISOC types and
related ICANN cronies.

>
>
> I ask Joop to remove me from the membership list of the
> hijacked site, and I ask the panel members to either turn this
> list into a rules-based list or to start another list with
> daily posting limits and restrictions for off-topic postings.

That would be an illegitimate hijacking in itself, Alexander, a move
without sanction from the general membership...

Regards,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de