[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Open call to join
At 05:56 31/12/02, Joop Teernstra wrote:
Richard,
Would you agree if the Polling Questions in the Booth were phrased:
"
Do you want:
(A) want the group to help build up ICANN's Regional At Large
Organizations and structures? (provide an informational link) (Yes/No
/Undecided)
(B) want the group to form a coalition with its own structures OUTSIDE the
ICANN scheme, independent from the "At Large" that ICANN is trying
to develop. (Yes/No /Undecided)
"
Provided that A and B are NOT perceived as alternatives I do second that.
Joop, your polling booth has always been a pain because of the need to
remember an ID/password. Could you just not find a way to have the
passwords in the URL, a maiol sent to the voters and the mail repeated
several times so we could only click on the link, either to vote or to know
the status of the vote.
Also that all the running votes are displayed in the same page, to keep it
simple.
I also suggest that you establish a "vote@large" organization under any
cheap be serious law where at large voters could elect four other polling
officers sharing your access to the boot data and certifying the votes.
My feeling is that the boot failed until now because you cannot really
adapt it to practical experience and because you wanted to integrate it
into a formal structure. As a stand alone formal and a neutral service it
has chances to fly and develop. Is there no way for you to make what I call
for three years : to get a programmer on it and to make it a real
professional and possibly commercial poll and voting multi-lingual system?
jfc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de