[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] replacing panel members
Bull,
a retired panel member must be replaced prior to a vote.
Vittorio, someone suggested to me once that you were a lawyer.
In that case this is a fraud. Because there is no possibillity a lawyer
would not know that a replacement must take place before a vote.
60% of the panel is a full panel. Not one half based on retirement.
Vittorio perhaps you should join Denise.
e
> On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:01:38 +1300, you wrote:
>
>>In the meantime the members have the right to demand the full
>>compliance with quorum requirements. The quorum is 7.
>
> In fact, the rules adopted by the panel say "the quorum is 60% of the
> panel" (6 over 10, since Vivek had not been replaced yet) - and we
> finally got a seventh vote. I think we could consider the vote valid.
> --
> vb. [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
> -------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de For
> additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de