RE: [atlarge-discuss] vote

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

Jefsey,

I oppose the use of the Joop booth as long as indeed it is only him who
has access to the rawdata, stonger yet, no one involved should have
that.

It leaves room for manipulation which is something we should definitely
not leave open.

Also his attitude towards this in a sense that he decides the rules and
the watchers are beyond normal democratic behaviour, it borders on
destructive towards the organization.

I suggest we either write our own client, the email system you proposed,
or ask the gnso to either run it or let us use their software, there are
enough ppl with servers here to run it.

Abel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr] 
> Sent: 28 February 2003 12:35
> To: abel@able-towers.com
> Cc: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] vote
> 
> 
> On 12:12 28/02/03, Abel Wisman said:
> >Jefsey, Bruce, please give the members an accurate timeline on the 
> >official vote, including a complete proposed set of rules, which 
> >without to much objections can be accepted by proclamation.
> 
> Dear Abel;
> basically I suppose we will do what we said and all agreed, 
> ie the time line of Richard.
> 
> The important thing is to know if we (Panel and Watchdog agree
> about:
> - me being a watchdog
> - us to be able to use the polling-booth or not, ie if
>    - Joop accepts it without wanting to rule the vote
>    - he is or not a candidate
>    - if we can have 5 trustess with or or two genuine programmers
>    what I frankly hope I can take time in setting a second
>    polling system we might may be get some funding from.
> 
> jfc
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de