[atlarge-discuss] Report to the Polling Committee on Nomination status

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

On 07:40 04/05/03, bruce@barelyadequate.info said:
> Joop Teernstra wrote:
> | Not allowing for seconding gives far too much power to the nominator.
>
> Who said nomination needn't be seconded?  The message that went out
> requesting nominations clearly said otherwise, to wit:
>
> 3. Persons nominated by more than one person will be considered to be
> seconded. Those nominated only once will be identified on the At Large
> Discuss list, and readers of the Discuss list will be given the opportunity
> to second their nomination.
Dear Polling Committee Members,

This is a report on the present status of the responses of Nominees.

1. difficulties created by icannatlarge.com

    -  "nominated not seconded". This results from an ambiguous response 
of mine due to a different voting culture. The above "3." says that persons 
nominated twice or more are considered as nominated. This is the case of 
all the persons I nominated, after a first wide nomination. In addition, 
Joop Teernstra seconded some of them, and nominated two others I seconded.

    - Joop Teernstra claims that he has organized its own collection of 
nominations and just released a list of names he hide from us until now. We 
have no way to know when these Members have been nominated and by who. Most 
probably some legitimately believe they have been nominated before the 
limit. We all are conscious this is an usual destablization action from 
Joop, but I propose the Members do not suffer from it (and voters may 
decide if Joop's attitude is right or wrong). I vote that:

     - we take the list and accept Joop's nomination of these Members (if 
they are Members)
     - we second them to make them legitimate nominees
     - I send them the letter to the nominees and we give them an extra day

     Please urgently vote on this: one positive vote from any of you is 
enough. Otherwise we will go by the published rules.


2. 68 Members have been nominated. So far

- 4 have accepted
Asaad Alnajjar
Thierry Amoussougbo
Hugh Blair
James Khan

- 1 has accepted but will confirm due to professional load
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch

- 14 have declined
Amadeu Abril i Abril
Marilyn Cade
Esther Dyson
David Farrar
Leah Gallegos
Michael Geist
Wolfgang Kleinwaechter
James Love
Judyth Mermelstein
Marc Schneiders
Greg Shaw
Jan Siren
Dany Vandromme
Jon Weinberg

- 4 have questionned, argued or disputed and not responded
Joe Baptista
Cordley Coit
Johannes JTeernstra
Jeffrey Williams

- 3 have not updated their address
Domingo Barón
Hans Klein
Desiree Miloshevic

- 42 have not responded yet
Izumi Aizu
Sebastien Bachollet
Pascal Bernhard
Joe Borda
Ted Byfield
Eung HwiChun
Patrick Corliss
Pierre Dandjinou
Marc Derrienic
Rod Dixon
Raul Echeberria
Bret Fausett
Steven Heath
Richard Henderson
Jeanette Hofmann
Erick Iriarte
Norbert Klein
Joanna Lane
Soobok Lee
Alan Levin
Chris McElroy
Kristy McKee
Roeland Meyer
Pierre Mounier
Andy Müller-Maguhn
Pierre Ouedraogo
YJ Park
Gabriel Piñeiro
Elisabeth Porteneuve
Roozbeh Pournader
Michael Roberts
Jonathan Robin
Thomas Roessler
Walter Schmidt
Charles Shaban
Ron Sherwood
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Holger Steiner
Alexander Svensson
Stephen Waters
Abel Wisman
Xennt

they have been sent the current response list.






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de