RE: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Micheal Sherrill [mailto:micheal@beethoven.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 5:03 PM
|> To: Sotiris Sotiropoulos; Sotiris Sotiropoulos
|> Cc: At Large Discuss
|> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll
|>
|>
|> I am not a Panelist.  But, four (4) is a nice round number
|> for a quorum.

Think about this for a bit.  There are 11 panelists, with a Quorum
requirement of 4 the potential is there for two simultaneous meetings
with both meeting the requirement.  The minimum number you can have for
a Quorum with such a panel is six (6).

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de