Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Micheal Sherrill wrote:

> Hello Dassa:
>
> This quandary would only exist if there were 11 real members.  You assume too much.
Agreed.  First order of business for the Membership Committee is the 
verification of the 11 Panelists.

--Sotiris

> Regards,
>
>
> Micheal Sherrill
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>
> Reply-To: <dassa@dhs.org>
> Date:  Sun, 1 Jun 2003 18:42:19 +1000
>
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: Micheal Sherrill [mailto:micheal@beethoven.com]
> |> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 5:03 PM
> |> To: Sotiris Sotiropoulos; Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> |> Cc: At Large Discuss
> |> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll
> |>
> |>
> |> I am not a Panelist.  But, four (4) is a nice round number
> |> for a quorum.
>
> Think about this for a bit.  There are 11 panelists, with a Quorum
> requirement of 4 the potential is there for two simultaneous meetings
> with both meeting the requirement.  The minimum number you can have for
> a Quorum with such a panel is six (6).
>
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>
> *************************************************
> Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
>            http://www.beethoven.com
> Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>  
--
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

> From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de