Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>]

The question of Panel Votes needs clarity and definition.

So does the issue of panelists who fail to vote : this was a major problem
last year.

I refer you to these draft Bylaws:
http://www.icannatlarge.co.uk/draftbylawsarticle03.htm
Article 3.1 Majority of panelists needed for quorum / authoritative vote
Sufficient notice of motion/vote to be afforded, to allow informed
discussion by community
Article 3.2 Public Record to be kept of vote, and each panelists vote

I also refer you to: http://www.icannatlarge.co.uk/draftbylawsarticle09.htm
Article 9.6 Time must be allowed for *all* panelists to vote, even after
quorum reached, before final count is taken
Article 9.7 Timescale and Voting Procedure for Panel
Sanctions against Panelists who repeatedly fail to vote

Hope some of this is worth considering


Richard Henderson



----- Original Message -----
From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: At Large Discuss <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll


> Fellow Panelists et al.,
>
> Congratulations.
>
> Let's jump right into things and decide the quorum requirement.
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de