Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists

["Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>]

On 1 Jun 2003 at 12:37, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> >I totally agree... with the addition that on this basis a renegade
> >panelist could 'get away' with a 33% voting record by voting once in
> >three votes, so I think all panelists should be bound to vote 75% of
> >the time, in addition to the three strikes and you're out rule!
> 
> I fully support this.

How frequently will votes be?  Somebody could be on vacation for a 
week and not be able to check their email.

-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de