[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] incorporation - misinformation debunked
Eric and all fellow members,
Eric Dierker wrote:
> There is a wrong assumption here. It is OK and normal.
> Corporations file in a state. Period; end of story.
This is true. And such filings must be within the current
federal statutes for 501 C3 status, which I assume you
are referring to here. That status has recently changed
rather significantly which I posted some time ago
the particulars to this forum, as well as enforcement
via the DOJ has been requested by all US citizens
post 9/11 as a matter of vigilance, which each of
us as citizens, have a good works responsibility
to adhere to.
>
> The DOJ works on criminal misconduct - which we assume we will not do.
No, DOJ works in many areas other than simply criminal misconduct.
But sense you mention such behavior, there is some concern by the
DOJ as to purposeful criminal misconduct via the Jefsey-election.
>
> The SEC works on publicly traded and registered companies, from pink sheets
> in the NASDAQ to the DOW Jones - which we assume we will not do.
DOW-Jones is a company that lists a 30 public companies as
a bellwether of measuring the overall performance of the
publicly traded exchange market place companies. The two major
stock exchanges in the US are the NYSE and the NASDAQ.
There is also the AMEX as well, and it is of a lesser ranking
in some ways.. Hence, Eric your remarks above are inaccurate
as therefore to a degree misleading... I am sure this is out
of ignorance however, and as such no negative connotations
in this instance should be attributed to you...
>
> Therefor the only federal US gov. Control over what we would do is IRS.
Also incorrect. The DOC as well as the DOJ would be applicable.
See: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/ in areas such
as the IP see CCIPS Program as just one example.
>
> As a registered Tax representative I can say that they are really
> easy to deal with as long as we are responsible.
Oh? What is your ID #?
>
> Otherwise we just deal with a state Gov.
> I really only know of Canada, France, Mexico, Brazil, USA, China, and
> Vietnam currently although I am working on project IMECCA for Iraq and am
> familiar with Bahamas and VI (thanks to Peter God rest his soul). But what
> I say above is true for all of these wonderful locations.
Brazil has yet to sign the trade agreement with NAFTA or the
newly in process bilateral trade agreement legal reciprocity
documents as was announced by the DOC on July 1.
>
> However I think my truths are fairly universal.
Well sorry to date they are not yet...
>
> It is funny that you become a universal polling place but must rely on
> provincial regulation.
I rely on legal precepts that are enforceable, broadly excepted, and
can coincide with the broad nature of a membership organization
such as this one... That may be provincial in some aspects, and
not so in others.
>
>
> Best to all hardworking panelists, May your endeavors be pure of soul.
> Eric Hugh Dierker
This would be nice. But so far the Jefsey-election false
and Potentially fraudulent "Panel".
>
>
> > Eric and all fellow members,
> >
> > I am sure, and recently re-assured by the DOJ that the gist of your
> > retort
> > below is yet again inaccurate. I suggest you update your legal
> > knowledge in this area, and probably others, to post 2001, Eric.
> >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de