[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] No-Name Internet Use Poses Security Threat-Report
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] No-Name Internet Use Poses Security Threat-Report
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:39:43 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000322/wr/technology_internet_2.html
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
Wednesday March 22 4:27 PM ET
No-Name Internet Use Poses Security Threat-Report
LONDON (Reuters) - An Internet system designed to guarantee anonymous
free speech on the Web could be used by child pornographers and
terrorists, according to New Scientist magazine.
Freenet was created by Edinburgh University graduate Ian Clarke and
other programmers to make tracing the originators of a file
impossible, thereby giving dissidents in countries without free
speech a voice.
But the Internet Watch Foundation, an independent body that monitors
Web sites in Britain, fears the decentralized system could be used
for more sinister purposes.
``There is clear potential for misuse by criminals, terrorists and
pedophiles,'' Roger Darlington, the chairman of the foundation, told
the weekly magazine in its latest issue.
British police also warned that it could make policing the Internet
and tracking down computer crimes even more difficult.
Freenet's authors are difficult to track down because files do not
have a unique Internet address and are distributed on computers
belonging to Freenet members.
``When a file is stored, it is given a key, Freenet's equivalent of a
Web address. The software then forwards the data to other servers,
but the creator of the file doesn't know to which. To retrieve a
file, users enter the key,'' New Scientist said.
According to Clarke a single computer user cannot be held responsible
for Freenet files because the originator cannot be traced.
``It's perfect machine anarchy,'' said Clarke. ``No single computer
is in control.''
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------