[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) Xerox, Microsoft, XrML, ContentGuard, &c.
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) Xerox, Microsoft, XrML, ContentGuard, &c.
- From: "Axel H Horns" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 10:35:39 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Mon, 1 May 2000 01:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: "P.J. Ponder" <email@example.com>
Subject: Xerox, Microsoft, XrML, ContentGuard, &c.
Microsoft is funding an initiative at Xerox's Palo Alto Reseach Center
on digital rights management. Lots of press hype available at their
They are touting an 'open' standard initiative called XrML, which is
an attempt to harmonize digital rights syntax. There is a lengthy web
form located at:
which I guess allows one to download the XrML spec. Why they just
couldn't post it on the site is beyond me - especially if they would
like to characterize it as an open standard. It's easier to get PGP
or an ISO standard.
I filled in the form, and got this reply:
| Thanks for registering with XrML.org
| The XRML spec will be mailed to the e-mail address firstname.lastname@example.org
within | five business days.
I think one needs Adobe Acrobat version 4.05 to read the spec,
according to a message posted on their webboard.
Some of the patents cited at the XrML (http://www.xrml/org) site:
------- End of forwarded message -------