[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] DCMA auf Europaeisch buchstabiert
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] DCMA auf Europaeisch buchstabiert
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:18:06 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/00/st09/09512en0.pdf
------------------------------ CUT ------------------------------
[...]
(47) Technological development will allow rightholders to make use of
technological measures designed to prevent or restrict acts not
authorised by the rightholders of any copyright, rights related to
copyright or the sui generis right in databases. The danger, however,
exists that illegal activities might be carried out in order to
enable or facilitate the circumvention of the technical protection
provided by these measures. In order to avoid fragmented legal
approaches that could potentially hinder the functioning of the
internal market, there is a need to provide for harmonised legal
protection against circumvention of effective technological measures
and against provision of devices and products or services to this
effect.
(48) Such legal protection should be provided in respect of
technological measures that effectively restrict acts not authorised
by the rightholders of any copyright, rights related to copyright or
the sui generis right in databases without, however, preventing the
normal operation of electronic equipment and its technological
development. Such legal protection implies no obligation to design
devices, products, components or services to correspond to
technological measures, so long as such device, product, component or
service does not otherwise fall under the prohibition of Article 6.
Such legal protection should respect proportionality and should not
prohibit those devices or activities which have a commercially
significant purpose or use other than to circumvent the technical
protection. In particular, this protection should not hinder research
into cryptography.
(49) The legal protection of technological measures is without
prejudice to the application of any national provisions which may
prohibit the private possession of devices, products or components
for the circumvention of technological measures.
(50) Such a harmonised legal protection does not affect the specific
provisions on protection provided for by Directive 91/250/EEC. In
particular, it should not apply to the protection of technological
measures used in connection with computer programs, which is
exclusively addressed in that Directive. It should neither inhibit
nor prevent the development or use of any means of circumventing a
technological measure that is necessary to enable acts to be
undertaken in accordance with the terms of Article 5(3) or Article 6
of Directive 91/250/EEC. Articles 5 and 6 of that Directive
exclusively determine exceptions to the exclusive rights applicable
to computer programs.
(51) The legal protection of technological measures applies without
prejudice to public policy, as reflected in Article 5, or public
security. Member States should promote voluntary measures taken by
rightholders, including the conclusion and implementation of
agreements between rightholders and other parties concerned, to
accommodate achieving the objectives of certain exceptions or
limitations provided for in national law in accordance with this
Directive. In the absence of such voluntary measures or agreements
within a reasonable period of time, Member States should take
appropriate measures to ensure that rightholders provide
beneficiaries of such exceptions or limitations with appropriate
means of benefiting from them, by modifying an implemented
technological measure or by other means. However, in order to prevent
abuse of such measures taken by rightholders, including within the
framework of agreements, or taken by a Member State, any
technological measures applied in implementation of such measures
should enjoy legal protection.
(52) When implementing an exception or limitation for private copying
in accordance with Article 5(2)(b), Member States should likewise
promote the use of voluntary measures to accommodate achieving the
objectives of such exception or limitation. If, within a reasonable
period of time, no such voluntary measures to make reproduction for
private use possible have been taken, Member States may take measures
to enable beneficiaries of the exception or limitation concerned to
benefit from it. Voluntary measures taken by rightholders, including
agreements between rightholders and other parties concerned, as well
as measures taken by Member States, do not prevent rightholders from
using technological measures which are consistent with the exceptions
or limitations on private copying in national law in accordance with
Article 5(2)(b), taking account of the condition of fair compensation
under that provision and the possible differentiation between various
conditions of use in accordance with Article 5(5), such as
controlling the number of reproductions. In order to prevent abuse of
such measures, any technological measures applied in their
implementation should enjoy legal protection.
(53) Important progress has been made in the international
standardisation of technical systems of identification of works and
protected subject-matter in digital format. In an increasingly
networked environment, differences between technological measures
could lead to an incompatibility of systems within the Community.
Compatibility and interoperability of the different systems should be
encouraged. It would be highly desirable to encourage the development
of global systems.
(54) Technological development will facilitate the distribution of
works, notably on networks, and this will entail the need for
rightholders to identify better the work or other subject-matter, the
author or any other rightholder, and to provide information about the
terms and conditions of use of the work or other subject-matter in
order to render easier the management of rights attached to them.
Rightholders should be encouraged to use markings indicating, in
addition to the information referred to above, inter alia their
authorisation when putting works or other subject-matter on networks.
(55) There is, however, the danger that illegal activities might be
carried out in order to remove or alter the electronic copyright-
management information attached to it, or otherwise to distribute,
import for distribution, broadcast, communicate to the public or make
available to the public works or other protected subject-matter from
which such information has been removed without authority. In order
to avoid fragmented legal approaches that could potentially hinder
the functioning of the internal market, there is a need to provide
for harmonised legal protection against any of these activities.
(56) Any such rights-management information systems referred to above
may, depending on their design, at the same time process personal
data about the consumption patterns of protected subject-matter by
individuals and allow for tracing of on-line behaviour. These
technical means, in their technical functions, should incorporate
privacy safeguards in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the
protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal
data and the free movement of such data 1 .
(57) Member States should provide for effective sanctions and
remedies for infringements of rights and obligations as set out in
this Directive. They should take all the measures necessary to ensure
that those sanctions and remedies are applied. The sanctions thus
provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and
should include the possibility of seeking damages and/or injunctive
relief and, where appropriate, of applying for seizure of infringing
material.
[...]
CHAPTER III
Protection of technological measures and rights-management
information
Article 6
Obligations as to technological measures
1. Member States shall provide adequate legal protection against the
circumvention of any effective technological measures, which the
person concerned carries out in the knowledge, or with reasonable
grounds to know, that he or she is pursuing that objective.
2. Member States shall provide adequate legal protection against the
manufacture, import, distribution, sale, rental, advertisement for
sale or rental, or possession for commercial purposes of devices,
products or components or the provision of services which:
(a) are promoted, advertised or marketed for the purpose of
circumvention of, or
(b) have only a limited commercially significant purpose or use other
than to circumvent, or
(c) are primarily designed, produced, adapted or performed for the
purpose of enabling or facilitating the circumvention of, any
effective technological measures.
3. For the purposes of this Directive, the expression "technological
measures" means any technology, device or component that, in the
normal course of its operation, is designed to prevent or restrict
acts, in respect of works or other subject-matter, which are not
authorised by the rightholder of any copyright or any right related
to copyright as provided for by law or the sui generis right provided
for in Chapter III of Directive 96/9/EC. Technological measures shall
be deemed "effective" where the use of a protected work or other
subject-matter is controlled by the rightholders through application
of an access control or protection process, such as encryption,
scrambling or other transformation of the work or other subject-
matter or a copy control mechanism, which achieves the protection
objective.
4. Notwithstanding the legal protection provided for in paragraph 1,
in the absence of voluntary measures taken by rightholders, including
agreements between rightholders and other parties concerned, Member
States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that rightholders
make available to the beneficiary of an exception or limitation
provided for in national law in accordance with Article 5(2)(a),
(2)(c), (2)(d), (2)(e), (3)(a), (3)(b) or (3)(e) the means of
benefiting from that exception or limitation, to the extent necessary
to benefit from that exception or limitation and where that
beneficiary has legal access to the protected work or subject-matter
concerned.
A Member State may also take such measures in respect of a
beneficiary of an exception or limitation provided for in accordance
with Article 5(2)(b), unless reproduction for private use has already
been made possible by rightholders to the extent necessary to benefit
from the exception or limitation concerned and in accordance with the
provisions of Article 5(2)(b) and (5), without preventing
rightholders from adopting adequate measures regarding the number of
reproductions in accordance with these provisions.
The technological measures applied voluntarily by rightholders,
including those applied in implementation of voluntary agreements,
and technological measures applied in implementation of the measures
taken by Member States, shall enjoy the legal protection provided for
in paragraph 1. The provisions of the first and second subparagraphs
shall not apply to works or other subject-matter made available to
the public on agreed contractual terms in such a way that members of
the public may access them from a place and at a time individually
chosen by them. When this Article is applied in the context of
Directives 92/100/EEC and 96/9/EC, this paragraph shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
[...]
------------------------------ CUT ------------------------------