[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Beating Napster at its own game?
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Beating Napster at its own game?
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:15:22 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.zdnet.com/filters/printerfriendly/0,6061,2652781-2,00.html
-------------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------
Beating Napster at its own game?
By Almar Latour, WSJ Interactive Edition
November 13, 2000 5:00 AM PT
URL:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2652781,00.html?chkpt=hu
d0004200
Can the entertainment industry sue its way to a world free of
Internet piracy?
Not according to software development company MediaDefender Inc. The
Los Angeles-based startup thinks new music-swapping technologies and
so-called peer-to-peer music and entertainment networks will always
be one step ahead of the law. Instead of taking hackers to court, the
company argues, the entertainment industry should beat them with
their own weapon: technology.
How? MediaDefender claims the answer lies in "spoofing," a method in
which a peer-to-peer entertainment network is flooded with fake files
of a certain title. If an end user tries to download that title, he
receives a "spoof" that has the same title as the requested song or
video, but actually contains a message warning the user that he has
attempted to break copyright law.
"Legislation changes slowly, but technology changes at warp speed, "
says former law student Randy Saaf, the founder and chief executive
of MediaDefender, which has a staff of 10 at a tiny office near
Venice Beach. "Unauthorized duplication of copyrighted media is
impossible to avoid. If you can hear it, you can copy it. That means
you can only prevent piracy by attacking distribution channels."
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------