[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] UK: Threat to press on the Net
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] UK: Threat to press on the Net
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:09:47 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Comments: Sender has elected to use 8-bit data in this message. If problems arise, refer to postmaster at sender's site.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,66-85786,00.html
----------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------
FRIDAY FEBRUARY 16 2001
Threat to press on the Net
BY RAYMOND SNODDY
There is a deadening predictability to many of the responses to the
Government’s White Paper on communications submitted this week. Few
of the documents manage to raise their sights beyond narrow sectional
self-interest.
[...]
In an almost casual way, they note, the Government appears to be
trying to bring Internet content under statutory regulation in
addition to the normal rules of criminal law. The sleight of hand
involved is so skilful that you almost miss it.
The Government’s argument appears to rest on the apparently innocuous
notion that the Internet is an extension of broadcasting. Accept this
premise and you are lost because it means accepting for the Internet
the same structure of content regulation that has grown around
broadcasting. But while the Internet is a new form of communication
in its own right, it is much closer to the publishing than the
broadcasting model. Spectrum is not in short supply and entry costs
are low.
The Government approach is strange, as it appears to undermine the
principles of self-regulation accepted in publishing in the form of
the Press Complaints Commission.
[...]
----------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------