[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FYI ] (Fwd) RIPlist Bulletin 21/3/01: Hong Kong proposesdecryption powers similar to RIP
- To: Axel H Horns <horns@ipjur.com>
- Subject: Re: [FYI ] (Fwd) RIPlist Bulletin 21/3/01: Hong Kong proposesdecryption powers similar to RIP
- From: Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@ibm.rhrz.uni-bonn.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:05:35 +0100 (CET)
- cc: debate@fitug.de, krypto@thur.de
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <3AB871D0.5332.16E95A@localhost>
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
> relationship between solicitors and clients; (d) there should be
> provision for the destruction of the encrypted information once it is
> obtained; and (e) there should be a right to sue law enforcement
> agencies if any material is leaked as a result of the negligence of
> the law enforcement agencies
Immerhin. Wird denn im Uebrigen zwischen Zeugen und Beschuldigten
unterschieden ?
H.