[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] ECHELON Conclusion [of An U.S.-Patriot]
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] ECHELON Conclusion [of An U.S.-Patriot]
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:13:07 +0200
http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?50+Duke+L.+J.+1467
--------------------------------- CUT ------------------------------
ECHELON AND THE LEGAL RESTRAINTS ON SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE: A NEED FOR
REEVALUATION
LAWRENCE D. SLOAN
[...]
CONCLUSION
Given all of the above criticism of the current legal regime
governing SIGINT activities, one might think that the author is
firmly in favor of further restricting the capabilities of American
SIGINT organizations. This is not the case. The services provided by
these organizations are essential to the national security of this
nation. Although the intelligence community, especially the segment
involved [*pg 1510] in SIGINT, is necessarily hesitant to trumpet its
successes, there can be little doubt that the information gathered
via SIGINT operations has saved the lives of numerous Americans both
in the United States and abroad.199 Systems such as ECHELON must be
permitted to function in the most effective manner possible that does
not unacceptably compromise the privacy and freedoms that are so
important to Americans. It is understandable that this may involve
some invasion of the privacy of American persons, but this is a
balance that must be maintained. While the prospect of occasionally
having innocent e-mail messages screened by a NSA computer is
troublesome, the prospect of inhaling sarin gas on the New York City
subway system is far more alarming. Given our democratic form of
government, this balance must be dictated by our elected officials,
namely Congress and the President.
[...]
--------------------------------- CUT ------------------------------