[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Recording industry exploits WTC tragedy to hack you
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Recording industry exploits WTC tragedy to hack you
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:23:36 +0200
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/22252.html
------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
Recording industry exploits WTC tragedy to hack you
By Thomas C Greene in Washington
Posted: 16/10/2001 at 10:51 GMT
Capitol Hill lobbyists representing the Recording Industry Ass. of
America (RIAA) tried to attach a self-serving amendment to recent
anti-terror legislation which would have made it legal for copyright
owners to hack computer networks in search of copyright-infringing
material and destroy them, Wired News reports.
Panic over proposals which would have made all forms of hacking and
computer sabotage a 'terrorist act' punishable by life in prison
appears to have inspired the entertainment industry to secure itself
an exception so it can 'go vigilante' to defend the precious
sacrament of copyright.
The proposed amendment reads:
"No action may be brought under this subsection arising out of any
impairment of the availability of data, a program, a system or
information, resulting from measures taken by an owner of copyright
in a work of authorship, or any person authorized by such owner to
act on its behalf, that are intended to impede or prevent the
infringement of copyright in such work by wire or electronic
communication; provided that the use of the work that the owner is
intending to impede or prevent is an infringing use."
We note the phrase 'any impairment', a blanket which would indeed
sanction network sabotage, and which implies the right to use
nefarious means of detection. If it didn't, it would have clearly
specified 'action taken on evidence lawfully obtained'. But it
doesn't. 'Any impairment' includes installing a Trojan on a file-
share network, and then remotely wiping it out.
Fortunately this ignoble effort failed, but the RIAA still inclines
towards a presumption that existing law should shield them from such
malevolent activities. And if their little bought lapdogs, US
Senators Fritz Hollings (Democrat, South Carolina) and Ted Stevens
(Republican, Alaska), have their way with a proposed super-DMCA
called the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA),
they might just make that mad assertion stick.
------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------