[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] EU: Surveillance of telecommunications
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] EU: Surveillance of telecommunications
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:33:05 +0200
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/may/05surv.htm
--------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
Surveillance of telecommunications
EU governments are secretly drafting a binding Framework Decision to
introduce the universal surveillance of telecommunications
- European Parliament faces crucial vote on 15 May to reject the
governments' demands on the retention of data and access by the law
enforcement agencies
Statewatch has learnt that in advance of the completion of the EU
legislative process on proposals for the revision of the 1997 EU
Directive on privacy in the telecommunications sector a number of EU
governments are drafting a binding Framework Decision to ensure that
all EU member states introduce a law requiring the retention of
telecommunications traffic data and the granting of access to it by
law enforcement agencies (police, customs, immigration and internal
security agencies).
On 15 May the European Parliament plenary session is due to vote on a
report adopted by the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights on
18 April. This report re-affirmed the position taken by the
parliament in its 1st reading on 13 November 2001 which opposed the
fundamental change being put forward by the Council. Under the 1997
Directive data can only be retained for a short period for "billing"
purposes (ie: to help the customer confirm usage details) and then it
must be erased. The Council want this data to be retained for law
enforcement agencies to access. The European Parliament proposes that
the current position is maintained whereby such data can be accessed
for the purposes of national security and criminal investigations
where it is authorised in a case-by-case basis by judicial
authorities.
The Council of the European Union (the 15 governments) and the
European Parliament are thus potentially on a collision course over
the issue. As the measure is subject to the co-decision procedure,
whereby the Council and the European Parliament has to agree the
final text, if the parliament holds to its position then the process
moves into the stage where a "Conciliation Committee" is set up to
reach agreement.
However, the next stage is the crucial vote in the European
Parliament on 15 May where a majority of MEPs, 314 out of 626, have
to back the parliament's 2nd reading position. If the position
adopted in November and confirmed in April this year does not get the
backing of the majority of MEPs then the Council's position will
carry the day.
The Brussels "spin machine" will be hard at work trying to re-assure
MEPs that the Council's proposal is not binding on EU member states
and that it will be up to each governement (and parliament) to decide
how to respond. However, this position is completley exposed by the
revelation that EU governments are planning to adopt a Framework
Decision which will bind all members states to introduce the
retention of data.
Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor, comments:
"By drafting a binding Framework Decision before the proper
legislative process is finished EU governments are showing their
utter disregard for the European Parliament.
The vote in the European Parliament and the final decision on this
issue will be a defining moment for the future of democracy in the
EU. If all telecommunications - phone-calls, e-mails, faxes and
internet usage - are placed under surveillance not only will data
protection be fatally undermined but so too will be the very freedoms
that distinguish democracies from authoritarian regimes"
Background
1. Statewatch News online: April 2002: Narrow vote in European
Parliament on data retention
2. Statewatch summary: European Commission sells out
3. Statewatch bulletin, January-February 2002: Final decision on
surveillance of telecommunications
4. Statewatch report, up to 11 September: Data protection or data
retention in the EU? (pdf)
Story filed 8.5.02
--------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de