[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) FC: "Child modeling" bill would instead censor commercial photography
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: "Child modeling" bill would instead censor commercial photography
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 16:00:07 +0200
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:25:11 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: politech@politechbot.com
Subject: FC: "Child modeling" bill would instead censor commercial photography
Send reply to: declan@well.com
Text of the Foley-Lampson "child modeling" bill:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/foley.child.exploitation.bill.050902.p
df
Rep. Foley's press release:
http://www.gop.gov/item-news.asp?N=20020507140831
---
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,52379,00.html
Too Broad a Ban on Child Models?
By Declan McCullagh
2:00 a.m. May 9, 2002 PDT
WASHINGTON -- A new bill in Congress designed to outlaw child-sex
websites would instead ban nearly all commercial photography of
minors.
Rep. Mark Foley (R-Florida) announced the proposal would ban
websites featuring controversial images of nude preteen children.
"These websites are nothing more than a fix for pedophiles," Foley
said.
He said there has been a disturbing increase of websites with names
like "Sunny Lolitas," that show off prepubescent girls playing with
stuffed animals or stretched out pin-up style against hot red
backgrounds. His press release says pedophiles pay to see photos
and video clips of the children in sexually suggestive poses.
But -- whoops! -- that's not what his bill (PDF) actually covers.
Five legal scholars contacted by Wired News said that Foley's
proposal, cosponsored by Rep. Nick Lampson (D-Texas) and touted at
a press conference on Monday, is so broadly written that it would
imperil perfectly innocent photography and videography of children
and teenagers.
In addition to prohibiting commercial photography of anyone under
17 years old, their bill would make it a federal felony for stock
photo houses like Corbis or Getty Images to license images of
minors from their catalogs -- a billion-dollar industry -- or for
news photographers to sell images of minors.
James Mitchell, associate general counsel for Corbis, said the
Child Modeling Exploitation Prevention Act, or CMEPA, would
"negatively impact the industry" and likely violates the First
Amendment's guarantees of freedom of speech.
[...]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this
notice. To subscribe to Politech:
http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is
archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs
are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Sign this pro-therapeutic cloning petition:
http://www.franklinsociety.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------- End of forwarded message -------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de