[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
US Government Control of ICANN?
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: US Government Control of ICANN?
- From: sascha <bleed@de-bug.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:39:02 +0200
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-934848.html
-------------------------------- CUT ------------------------------
Senator calls for U.S. control of ICANN
Reuters
June 11, 2002, 5:10 AM PT
WASHINGTON--A U.S. senator said he would try to rein in the group
that oversees the Internet's traffic system, calling for a more
direct U.S. government role in the ostensibly international and
independent body.
Sen. Conrad Burns, a Montana Republican, on Monday said he likely
would introduce a bill to require the Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers, also known by its acronym ICANN, to give
the U.S. government more influence in managing the domain-name
system. The system lets Internet users navigate the Web with
easy-to-remember names like "www.example.com."
If ICANN failed to cooperate, Burns said, it could be stripped of its
authority when its contract comes up for renewal this fall.
In a statement released two days before a Senate subcommittee is
scheduled to hold hearings on the global body, Burns said the change
was necessary because ICANN has exceeded its authority, does not
operate in an open fashion, and is dangerously unaccountable to
Internet users, businesses and other key interest groups.
"The U.S. needs to ensure ICANN operates with the same sort of
internal processes as in any other federal agency," he said.