[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Patent auf lernende Spamfilter (fwd)
- To: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
- Subject: Re: MS-Patent auf lernende Spamfilter (fwd)
- From: "Neko (Simone Demmel)" <neko@greenie.muc.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:57:11 +0200
- Cc: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208201007560.1823-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208201007560.1823-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
PILCH Hartmut (phm@a2e.de) - Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:08:09AM +0200:
> > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='6,161,130'
> Hauptanspruch:
> 1. A method for mail server side filtering electronic mail received
> over a communication medium comprising the steps of:
> providing a first filter at the mail server including a list of spam
> messages which should not be sent to an end user;
> receiving a first electronic message ultimately intended for one or
> more end users at the mail server;
> comparing at the said mail server said received first electronic
> message to said spam messages provided in said first filter, said
> received first electronic message discarded if said received first
> electronic message is included as a spam message in said first filter
> and transmitting said first electronic message to the end user if said
> received first electronic message is not included as a spam message in
> said first filter;
> providing a second filter at the mail server for the receipt of a
> second electronic message sent over the communications medium from an
> end user, said second electronic message received at said second
> filter considered to be a spam message by the end user;
> providing a counter associated with said second filter;
> counting the number of repeated second electronic messages received by
> said second filter;
> adding said second electronic message to said first filter as a spam
> message, if said counter exceeds a predetermined value; and
> adding said second electronic message to said first filter as a spam
> message, if said second filter determines that said second electronic
> message is a spam message.
>
> geh?rt Microsoft jetzt die Idee, ein Regelsystem zum Herausfiltern von
> unerw?nschter E-Post dadurch zu erweitern, dass man dem Anwender erlaubt,
> unerw?nschte Sendungen von Hand zur?ckzuweisen und die Information ?ber
> solche Zur?ckweisungen sammelt und in die Datenbank der Filterregeln
> ?bernimmt.
SpamAssasin macht sowas doch schon seit Jahren (wer noch?)? Ist das Patent damit
nicht hinfaellig?
neko
--
Simone Demmel neko@greenie.muc.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de