[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) US to license security contractors?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) US to license security contractors?
- From: "Axel H Horns" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:57:43 +0200
- Delivered-To: mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org
- List-Help: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mailing-List: contact email@example.com; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
------- Forwarded message follows -------
From: Ian Brown <I.Brown@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
To: ukcrypto <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: US to license security contractors?
Date sent: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:36:40 +0100
Send reply to: email@example.com
More on the "licensing security consultants" thread, this time from
SANS in the US:
--30 September 2002 Security Contractor Certification
According to the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, the Bush
administration is planning to look into the possibility of requiring
computer security contractors to be certified by the government.
Critics of this plan say the cost may keep smaller companies, which
often have the most capable employees, from obtaining certification.
They also point out that certifying a company is meaningless if its
best employees leave; individual certification would be more
------- End of forwarded message -------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
For additional commands, e-mail: email@example.com