[FYI] (Fwd) FC: What Larry Did Get (just this once, mind you...)

["Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>]

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:      	Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:16:50 -0500
To:             	politech@politechbot.com
From:           	Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject:        	FC: What Larry Did Get (just this once, mind you...)
Send reply to:  	declan@well.com

I've tangled with Larry Lessig over politics for many years --
longtime Politech readers will remember Larry registering
what-declan-doesnt-get.com and his related book chapter.
(http://www.politechbot.com/p-00712.html) Because Larry can be very
wrong at times, we will frequently continue to disagree. :)

But Larry's work against the Copyright Term Extension Act has been
diligent, thorough, and praiseworthy. It's true that I think he's
right (http://news.com.com/2010-1071-960918.html) about the desired
outcome here, but I believe I'd be writing the same thing if I didn't.

It's also true that, as Eben Moglen suggests 
(http://news.com.com/2100-1023-980792.html), there might have been a
different outcome if Larry and his colleagues had waited a decade to
challenge the law. Courts, even the Supreme Court, can be influenced
by public outcry over too-restrictive technologies. Even justices
listen to grandchildren. But this is hindsight, and now we know where
the court stands.

The tussle leading up to the Supreme Court case has done two
interesting things. First, it has highlighted some of the recent
expansions of copyright law -- I think of the DMCA, NET Act, and CTEA
as the troika of the late 1990s -- and their problems. Second, it's
catalyzed a movement that will last beyond today. The second outcome
would not have happened without Larry championing this case.

The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was also 7-2. It galvanized conservative
activists in much the same way today's decision outrages members of
this ragtag movement of geeks, librarians, and Internet publishers.
Whatever your views on abortion, recognize that from the perspective
of the activists of the 1970s, Roe violated their values and had
government crossing a line that it ought not to have crossed. The
aftershocks continue today, with President Bush's faith-based
initiative plans as the latest.

But today's movement can't wait decades to seek more clueful justices
-- not that this tactic would work anyway -- and Congress seems
studiously uninterested (http://www.politechbot.com/p-04318.html) in
mending its errant ways.

Still, Larry's blog entry today is more dispirited than it should be:
>So I've got to go get onto a plane to go to my least favorite city
(DC). >My inbox is filling with kind emails from friends. Also with a
few of a >different flavor. It's my nature to identify most closely
with those of >the different flavor. David Gossett at the law firm of
Mayer Brown wrote >Declan, "Larry lost Eldred, 7-2." Yes, no matter
what is said, that is how >I will always view this case. The
constitutional question is not even >close. To have failed to get the
Court to see it is my failing.
>(http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/)

Yes, Larry lost the case. Or, more precisely, the justices veered in
the opposite direction. But Larry did the best job possible with the
facts at his disposal and the precedents in place at the time. The
very fact that (as we've heard so much) Congress has extended
copyrights something like 11 times so far must have made the majority
reluctant to go along. And the decisions from the district court and
the appeals court and the pointed questioning during oral arguments
should have presaged today's news.
(http://news.com.com/2100-1023-961467.html)

The problem now is what to do with this movement's angry fire. To his
credit, Larry will be one of the most prominent torchbearers. I made
my suggestions in August (http://news.com.com/2010-1071-949275.html),
and I suspect Larry will post his on his site. If Politechnicals would
like to send along their own, I'll dutifully compile and forward.

-Declan

PS: Here's the best roundup of info on the decision I've seen so far,
compiled by Donna Wentworth:
http://www.corante.com/copyfight/20030101.shtml#18051




----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this
notice. To subscribe to Politech:
http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is
archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs
are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Like Politech? Make a donation here:
http://www.politechbot.com/donate/ Recent CNET News.com articles:
http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---

------- End of forwarded message -------


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de