[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) FC: Boston Globe columnist: "Web filters at libraries are overdue"
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 00:17:36 -0400
To: politech@politechbot.com
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: FC: Boston Globe columnist: "Web filters at libraries are overdue"
Send reply to: declan@well.com
---
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:17:04 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Beam: "Web filters at libraries are overdue"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Web filters at libraries are overdue
By Alex Beam, Globe Columnist, 4/1/2003
I once wrote that ''librarians are indeed the unacknowledged
legislators of the universe,'' and I meant it. Their pay stinks,
their working conditions are worse than at the post office, but they
bring the world to us. Now librarians are caught up in a dramatic
First Amendment imbroglio over the recently adopted Children's
Internet Protection Act. The case, US v. American Library Association
et al., has reached the Supreme Court, with the ALA and the American
Civil Liberties Union aligned against the government. The government's
position is: We provide $200 million annually to public libraries for
computer-related programs. As a condition of this aid, we demand that
you filter out Internet pornography, especially for juvenile users.
The ALA and ACLU oppose the law on more or less classic First
Amendment grounds, arguing that libraries' Internet terminals are
''public forums'' where the government may not restrict speech. They
feel strongly that filters or ''blocking'' technologies end up weeding
out legitimate sites -- e.g., the Flesh Public Library in Piqua, Ohio
-- along with the illegal child pornography and the garden-variety
smut clogging up the Internet.
Well, we're all against censorship -- or are we? While the ACLU and
the usual band of First Amendment zealots are demanding
let-it-all-hang-out Internet access in libraries, some resistance has
arisen from an unexpected constituency: librarians. In Minneapolis
last week, 12 librarians sued their employer in federal court,
charging that the library's three-year-old Internet sites displayed
''virtually every imaginable kind of human sexual conduct,''
contributing to an ''intimidating, hostile and offensive workplace.''
''We were living in hell, and they were unwilling to acknowledge the
problem,'' plaintiff Wendy Adamson told the Minneapolis Star Tribune.
In Toronto -- admittedly a city that won't be affected by the Supreme
Court's decision -- a group of unruly teenagers chased a librarian out
of her building when she shut off their Internet porn connection. A
police officer told The Toronto Sun that teenagers consider the
library better than an amusement arcade because the latter doesn't
allow them free, unfettered access to all kinds of pornography.
...
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/091/living/Web_filters_at_libraries_
are_overdue+.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH evening reception in New York City at 7 pm, April 1, 2003
at CFP: http://www.politechbot.com/events/cfp2003/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this
notice. To subscribe to Politech:
http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is
archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs
are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ Like Politech? Make a donation here:
http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------- End of forwarded message -------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de