Re: Univention vs. SCO Behauptungen immer noch online

[Peter Kuhm <peter@null.priv.at>]

At 01:16 09.06.03 +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:

>Wann immer US Bürger (oder Besitz?) angegriffen wurde befindet
>man sich für zuständig. Egal wo.
>
>Diverse Internationale Abkommen führen evtl. dazu, das Deutschland
>einen US Gerichtsbeschluss nicht prüft, sondern dich aushändigt.
>Zumindest ohne deutsche Staatsbürgerschaft (und solange dir nicht
>die Todesstrafe droht) wird das wohl gehen.
>
>Und vermutlich wurde seit dem 11.9.01 auch in der hinsicht
>vieles auf wunsch der USA erleichtert. 


s.a. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/jun/01useu.htm

--- snip ---

EU: JHA Council to authorise signing of EU-USA agreements on extradition
and mutual legal assistance

- European Parliament adopts highly critical report
- Amnesty International say extradition agreement flawed

The meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council (JHA) in Luxembourg
on Thursday 5 June is expected to to mandate the Presidency to sign the
controversial agreements with the USA on extradition and mutual legal
assistance. This will be followed by the formal signing of the agreements at
the EU-US Summit on 25 June. Any future bilateral - between an EU member
state and the USA - "will have to be compatible with these EU-US agreements."
A new version of the two agreements, together with some limited explanatory
notes is now available (dated 3 June 2003): EU-US agreements [0] (pdf)

[..]

The Resolution agreed by the parliament says that:

"it is paradoxical to sign an agreement with the United States when several
European Union citizens are still being held at the US military base at
Guantanamo Bay, quite unlawfully under both US and international law
and without the slightest guarantee that they will receive a fair trial"

[..]

--- snap ---

[0] http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/jun/useu09153.pdf  


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de