[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FYI] Dirty rotten inducers - the law the IT world deserves?



<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/26/hatch_induce_act/>

Dirty rotten inducers - the law the IT world deserves?
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
Published Saturday 26th June 2004 09:34 GMT

It may soon be possible to carry around an AK-47 assault rifle and an 
iPod with you down the street - and be arrested for carrying the 
iPod.   

That's according to critics of a Senate amendment to the copyright 
code proposed by Sen. Orrin Hatch this week called the 'Induce Act'. 
He wants to make the 'intentional inducement of copyright 
infringement' an offense, and this will extend liability to any 
manufacturer of a device which plays infringed material, or a shop 
that sells such a device, they say. Click Here   

Hatch's terse amendment states that "the term 'intentionally induces' 
means intentionally aids, abets, induces, or procures; and intent may 
be shown by acts from which a reasonable person would find intent to 
induce infringement based upon all relevant information about such 
acts then reasonably available to the actor, including whether the 
activity relies on infringement for its commercial viability," in 
which caser the inducer becomes an infringer.   

However, the amendment also says that "nothing in this subsection 
shall enlarge or diminish the doctrines of vicarious and contributory 
liability for copyright infringement or require any court to unjustly 
withhold or impose any secondary liability for copyright 
infringement." And it's contributory liability that the RIAA want to 
see changed.   

In his floor speech introducing the measure, Hatch said that once 
people are given PCs, they are bound to infringe. (Many would agree 
with him there). So he frames his bill as a protection. Hatch said 
people weren't aware that they were breaking the law by running P2P 
software, (citing work by Harvard's Berkman Center, which says the 
Senator quoted them out of context) and therefore running "piracy 
machines" that had been designed to mislead their users. Therefore, 
his argument goes, the users are in need of protection from 
'inducement'.   

[...]  




-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de