[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Europol will Iridium abhören
- To: "debate@fitug.de" <debate@fitug.de>
- Subject: Re: Europol will Iridium abhören
- From: "Ralf W. Stephan" <stephan@tmt.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:18:09 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <20104081425207@artnetonline.com>; from Gunnar Anzinger on Thu, Nov 19, 1998 at 09:11:36PM +0100
- Mail-Followup-To: "debate@fitug.de" <debate@fitug.de>
- References: <20104081425207@artnetonline.com>
- Reply-To: stephan@tmt.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
> Europol will Iridium abhören
http://www.comw.org/qdr/cspinney.htm
(The Quadrennial Defense Review Commentaries)
Zitat:
When evaluating the adequacy of today's budget, it is also important
to remember that the size of our force structure is much smaller than
at any time during the Cold War. Compared to the force levels reached
during the 1980s, for example, combat units have been reduced by
greater amounts than a 26% cut back in spending would suggest. Air
Force tactical fighter wings, for example, have been slashed by 50%,
ships in Navy's battle fleet by 37%, and the Army's active duty
maneuver battalions by 44%. Although one might think these
disproportional cut backs are unique adjustments brought about by the
end of the Cold War, they are really part of a continuing evolution
that began in the mid 1950s.
Why does the much smaller post-Cold War military require a Cold War budget
to keep it running?
Könnte man ja auch bei uns fragen...,
ralf
--
Computers make it easier to do a lot of things, but most of the things
they make it easier to do don't need to be done. --Andy Rooney
http://www.tmt.de/~stephan/