[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE

To: debate@fitug.de
Subject: Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
From: ralf.stephan@fitug.de
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 10:41:10 +0100
Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <19990117100212.B31368@bayreuth-online.de>; from Ralf W. Stephan on Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 10:02:12AM +0100
Mail-Followup-To: debate@fitug.de
References: <77ge7n$q9u$7@seneca.ak.munich.ibm.com> <m101cnG-0003bAC@ulf.mali.sub.org> <19990117100212.B31368@bayreuth-online.de>
Reply-To: stephan@tmt.de
Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de

me:
> Verfahren mit schlechter Qualität die Gefahr besteht, daß das
> Briefgeheimnis unterwandert wird.

Oops, zu paranoid.  Es geht eher um Trafficanalyse.


ralf
PS: grmbl
-- 
The simplest, and most flexible, mechanism for exception handling is
to call a function.                     (the eCos(TM) Reference Manual)
http://www.tmt.de/~stephan/

References:
- Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
  - From: Harald Milz <hm@seneca.muc.de>
- Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
  - From: Bodo_Moeller@public.uni-hamburg.de (Bodo Moeller)
- Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
  - From: ralf.stephan@fitug.de
- Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
  - From: ralf.stephan@fitug.de

Prev by Date: Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
Next by Date: [FYI] UNESCO: Provider sollen zensurieren
Prev by thread: Re: [FYI] Smart Stamps in DE
Next by thread: [FYI] Wettbewerb durch Internet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread