[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] USA: Janet Reno on Crypto
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] USA: Janet Reno on Crypto
- From: "Axel H. Horns" <axel.horns@fitug.de>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 17:34:17 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: FITUG e.V.
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: axel.horns@fitug.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://jya.com/doj020499.htm#crypto
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
7 February 1999
Source: http://www.senate.gov/~appropriations/commerce/2499jr.htm
Jump to comments on encryption.
Statement of
Janet Reno
Attorney General of the United States
Before the
United States Senate
Committee on Appropriations
Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, and State
the Judiciary, and Related Agencies
February 4, 1999
INTRODUCTION
I am pleased to appear before you today to continue the dialogue
between the Department of Justice and the Committee on
our efforts to combat terrorism. At the outset, I would like to thank
the Chairman for his leadership and express my appreciation to the
Subcommittee for your interest and support in counter- terrorism
matters.
[...]
C. Encryption
Court-authorized electronic surveillance (wiretaps) and search and
seizure are two of the most critically important investigative
techniques used by law enforcement to prosecute crime including
terrorism. The growing use of strong, commercially-available,
non-recoverable encryption will significantly impair our ability to
effectively use wiretaps and conduct searches and seizures.
Encryption is extremely beneficial when used legitimately by
individuals and corporations to protect the privacy and
confidentiality of voice and data communications and sensitive
electronically stored information (computer files). In order to
provide individuals and corporations with greater privacy protections
as the world moves into the information age, both industry and
government are encouraging the use of strong encryption. But the use
of strong encryption by criminals and terrorists poses a significant
risk to public safety and national security.
Law enforcement has steadfastly expressed its concern about the
adoption of an encryption policy based solely on market
forces. Law enforcement, including the International Association of
Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriff's Association, the National
District Attorneys Association, the National Association of Attorney
Generals and the Major City Chiefs, continues to call for the adoption
of a balanced encryption policy -- one that meets the commercial needs
of industry as well as the needs of the public for effective law
enforcement.
The Administration is not currently seeking mandatory controls on
encryption, but instead is working with industry to find
voluntary solutions that meet privacy, electronic commerce and public
safety needs. We remain optimistic that such a voluntary approach
will be successful in addressing our public safety needs.
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------