[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] ECHELON
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] ECHELON
- From: Horns@t-online.de (Axel H. Horns)
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 09:38:31 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H. Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.newsindex.com/cgi-bin/result.cgi?http://www.abcnews.go.com/
sections/world/DailyNews/Echelon_990709.html
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
By David Ruppe
ABCNEWS.com
N E W Y O R K, July 16 _Some of America's
closest European allies suspect a massive U.S.
listening post, nestled on the quiet, windswept
moors of northern England, has secretly been
spying on European governments, businesses
and citizens.
[...]
In apparent response, the French government last
March issued a decree allowing the public to use more
powerful encryption, which would hamper eavesdropping
on, say, e-mail and telephone conversations.
Germany last month also announced it would relax
encryption controls and took the unusual step of
announcing it would promote the use of powerful
encryption throughout Germany _ even though both
moves will likely make eavesdropping by law
enforcement more difficult.
Neither government mentioned U.S. intelligence
gathering as a reason, though each alluded to a
growing threat of espionage against national
businesses and citizens.
In Britain, the government has been asked
repeatedly
to provide assurances that operations at Menwith Hill
are not breaking the law.
In March, a British member of Parliament queried
his
government on whether U.S. activities at Menwith Hill
fully comply with British law, U.S. law, European
Union law, and international law.
Not really answering the question, the
government
responded: "The United States Visiting Forces
authorities...at RAF Menwith Hill, are required to
respect the laws of this country."
Damaging European Report
Then, in April, the European Parliament released a
report specifically charging that the U.S. government
used information gained through eavesdropping during
international trade negotiations, and that U.S.
companies used it, too, to defeat European
competitors in major trade competitions.
The report, authored by British investigative
journalist
Duncan Campbell, cited several news accounts of
alleged economic espionage, including a 1995 story in
The Baltimore Sun.
"Former intelligence officials and other experts
say tips
based on spying... regularly flow from the Commerce
Department to U.S. companies to help them win
contracts overseas," the Sun reported.
The report said the Commerce Department, which
is
responsible for promoting U.S. trade, has an office
specially designated to receive information from the
intelligence community.
It also charged that Internet browsers and other
software shipped to Europe by American manufacturers
are intentionally disabled so secure communications
can be read by the U.S. National Security Agency, the
cornerstone organization of U.S. electronic
intelligence, without difficulty.
Since the report's release, Sweden's foreign
minister
has said his government will investigate whether
Swedish companies were harmed by American spying.
Another British MP has called on his government to
stop Menwith Hill from spying on British companies
and citizens.
The NSA refused to comment on Menwith Hill.
A Global System
The two European Parliament reports and two decades
of investigative reporting have established that
Menwith Hill and Bad Aibling form part of a scheme of
more than a dozen major listening posts operated
around the world by the United States, Britain,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand through a
semi-secret alliance called "UKUSA."
The sites are linked by a system known as
"ECHELON," through which the countries collect,
select and deliver to each other information
intercepted from communications worldwide.
The NSA also refuses to discuss UKUSA.
Governments Silent
Still, despite all the suspicions, no European
government has, at least publicly, protested UKUSA's
suspected eavesdropping.
Were the issue to be raised at the national
level, it
would likely occur through the European Union, says
Simon Davies, UK director of the watchdog group
Privacy International.
"If the level of commercial espionage is as it
has been
suggested in the European Parliament's report, then
both the [European Union's] Maastricht and the
Amsterdam treaties are being fundamentally violated
by Great Britain, and possibly Germany," he says.
But because the United States shares some
intelligence
with other governments, it is not clear what country
would bring a case, says Davies. "The Catch-22 is
that governments aren't going to take action on
ECHELON or any of the other NSA programs, because
they are in such collusion with the NSA."
Other countries outside the UKUSA alliance, such
as
Russia, Germany and France, also are believed to
operate their own, albeit less sophisticated,
eavesdropping facilities around the globe, and so
also may be reluctant to point fingers.
Another problem, observers say, is that the
ECHELON program has never been acknowledged by
the United States or Britain. "France can't ask for
an assurance on something that is not official," says
a French government official.
Exaggerated Concerns?
By the nature of National Security Agency's
technology _ which sweeps in all manner of
communications from commercial satellites, spy
satellites and other means_it is inevitable the
agency will intercept messages European companies
and citizens consider confidential, experts say.
But some are not convinced the agency is
extracting,
analyzing and sharing with U.S. companies such
information to any significant degree, if at all.
"The concerns of the European community are a
bit
overblown," says James Bamford, author of The Puzzle
Palace, the definitive book on the NSA.
"The [NSA is] not worried about some company in
Brussels. They're worried about the things you see
on the front page of The Washington Post and The New
York Times, terrorism, Kosovo."
Steve Aftergood, director of the project on
government
secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists in
Washington, agrees. "I don't know that to be the
case, namely, that industrial espionage is a policy
of the U.S. intelligence community."
The United States does collect "various kinds
of
photographic, signals, political and other
intelligence," Aftergood says, but he asserts the
economic intelligence collected by U.S. spy agencies
focuses more on "what is going on in markets,
emerging markets, where resources are being
identified and discovered."
However, Duncan Campbell, the author of the
European
Parliament's April report, doesn't believe any of
that for a minute. "Everybody does this. It's a
surprise to me that anybody thinks it's a surprise,"
he says.
"Yes, [U.S. spying] includes market trends but
it
doesn't stop there. If you are going to determine
economic trends in a fast moving economic situation
other than reading The Wall Street Journal and The
Financial Times, how are you going to do it? By
spying on contractual negotiations as they happen."
_David Ruppe
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------