[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Do you agree to this, Statement no. one:
- To: Alf Hansen <aha@uninett.no>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Do you agree to this, Statement no. one:
- From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 16:16:56 +1300
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <39D5CA59.E921178E@uninett.no>
- References: <5.0.0.25.0.20000930001641.00a4ed50@pop.wanadoo.fr>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
At 13:11 30/09/00 +0200, Alf Hansen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>>
>> Alf,
>> this is a scoop to me: you found the ICANN's owners.
>> I presume you mean the true unknown legal members?
>> Or did I miss something?
>> Jefsey
>>
>> At 20:45 29/09/00, you wrote:
>> >The ICANN Board and ICANN's owners should develop a concrete plan with a
>> >timescale for the achievement of this goal, including a study of the
>> >Legal and Regulatory aspects of such transition.
>
>The Global Internet Community is the true ICANN owners. Who can be able
>to represent this community as formal owners of a private non-commercial
>company like ICANN? I have no answer (yet). Do you think the Internet
>Society (ISOC) could be a candidate?
>
I'm afraid you would need a more bottom-up org than ISOC and one that is
not so closely linked to the interests of the big companies that finance ISOC.
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
the Cyberspace Association and
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org