Re: [icann-eu]

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 11:28 16/01/01, Wolfgang Kleinwächter said:
> Could somebody clarify the
> background of this mail or did I miss somethiong?
> Thanks
> wolfgang

Dear Wolfgang, what do you want to know more? 

1. there is a DNSO WG-Review committee going on under time pressure -
reporting now defacto to the BoD - where @large/DNSO are de facto
addressed. The report of the WG-Review will be certainly be used against
us at the @large Study Group. I do not want to look biased so please
judge by yourself in subscribing to their mailing list in sending a mail
to: majordomo@dnso.org with
subscirbe-wg-review as a text. If you have a problem let me know. 

In looking into the reported motions they right now try to have seconded
by the Members (look into hte pooling booth) you will see that they
report that:
"
The @large is
1. an un-organized grouping of all Internet users' diverse
interests.
2. without Charter or Mission statement
3. without means of the members to contact each other
4. subject to a Study that may reduce its representation on the Board or
do away with it altogether
5. represented by Directors that may be representing interests directly
opposed to typical DN holders' interests.
6. top-down and controlled by ICANN staff.
7. Unable to provide policy formulations to the ICANN Board
"

You may still wihtin one day or so register and vote against that (beware
the question they ask is good, only that comment indtroduced most
probably against the will of Mr. Joop Teemstra.  Joop is a dedicated
person who flamed @large by misundertsanding. He never intended this text
to be use as such.

2. I picked that piece of news online and I ask Andy Mueller-Maguhn to
comment as the wording is strange.

Jefsey

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
> To: <andy@ccc.de>
> Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:31 PM
> Subject: [icann-eu]
>
>
> > Dear Andy,
> > 1. Happpy New year. I am overloaded by this absurd WG-Review
> Committee. No
> > much new on your seid either or I have been removed from your
> information
> ML?
> >
> > 2. Press (ICBTollfree) say but I am not a subscriber to their
> services
> says:
> >
> > WHO IS ICANN *REALLY* INDEBTED TO?
> > The payment of $465,553.67 was made by ICANN's Executive Committee
> at a
> > meeting that excluded at-large board members Auerbach and
> Mueller-Maguhn.
> >
> > Could you comment for us?
> > Do you need support?
> >
> > Jefsey
> >
> >