Re: [icann-eu] Re: [ga] No Members?

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Now the question to your last post, should be why are you responding.  Mine was
a reply that included a letter from them that made onto the ga list.  The
letter was a letter to them, which ultimately was trying to justify Harald's
behind the scenes knowledge of the AL election, but as you can see proved the
faultiness of the process.

You answered because you monitor the ICANN-europe, not because this mail was
sent to you. But for some reason you took all the trouble to not repost there.

My positive comment is made to make sure that we remember that ICANN and "good
for the internet" are not necessarily synonymous.

Sincerely,

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> >
> >This entire thing is illness, look not at the proof of the returns.  Look
> >at the
> >proof of dooming the endeavor to failure. Thank you Harald for a
> >testimonial to
> >the fact that one person handled the entire matter - impossible.  An
> >example only
> >to be beaten in our small way in the GA of altering elections.  Don't get
> >me wrong
> >Danny is the best man for our chair but manipulating Corliss into his
> >position
> >through three changes through voting, ranks right up there with one person
> >to
> >handle 70,000 mailings or whatever.
> >If we tried for three days, to come up with a way to be unnacountable yet
> >destroy
> >the At large elections this is how we would do it.  I cannot buy Jeff's
> >incompetence routine anymore.
> >
> >We must move forward in a positive way.
>
> I agree with the last sentence.
>
> What escapes me is the relationship of this last sentence with the rest of
> the post.
>
> (why this mail is addressed to ICANN-EU also escapes me, but anyhow...)
>
> Regards
> Roberto
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.