[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[icann-europe] Re:ALSC publishes final draft
- To: icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [icann-europe] Re:ALSC publishes final draft
- From: Mike Roberts <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:23:56 -0700
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <20010914163509.A28038@panix.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <E15bhz6-0001zh-00@mrvdom04.kundenserver.de><005401c12fc8$ab20c220$96ff58c3@w0b6t6><a05100301b7b162011178@[192.156.200.2]> <20010914163509.A28038@panix.com>
At the time, going on three weeks ago, I had in mind something like
US $100 from several thousand individuals who actually were willing
to put their money where their mouth was about having a functioning
At Large organization.
Today, that idea is out the window, along with a lot of other
populist notions about any old terrorist around the globe getting to
vote on how to run the DNS.
When civilization takes a step backward, as it did last week, it
usually means a period in which the people with the guns make the
decisions. Anyone watching the American President on tv in recent
days knows that's where we're at. It may be a while before the
luxury of debating what constitutes consensus in a terrorist-less
society returns.
If you were thinking about contributing to an ICANN ALSO, send it to
the Red Cross instead.
- Mike
At 16:35 -0400 9/14/01, t byfield wrote:
>mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us (Tue 08/28/01 at 08:05 AM -0700):
>
>> Couldn't agree more. Those of us with some resources, or friends who
>> still have resources after their stock options have gone under water,
>> perhaps ought to petition the Board to establish a restricted fund
>> for the specific purpose of financing the ALSO. It would be
>> unfortunate if one or two large donations from foundations or others
>> with a "point of view" ended up dominating the financing of ALSO.
>
>(taking a jab at markle, are we then? tsk...)
>
>i know what you mean--'points of view' can be very insidious, especially
>when they involve kooky ideas like openness, a commitment to broad-based
>consultation *on a reasonable schedule*, actual consensus instead of sim-
>ulacra of consensus, and so on.
>
>it'd be much better to get a bunch of rich guys to fund an ALSO. and the
>idea of filtering their input through the board--now that's a plan.
>
cheers,
t
--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de